Marvin Kalb : La doctrine Powell
Enregistré le 22 octobre 2013
L'auteur et reporter chevronné Marvin Kalb décrit la doctrine Powell, la philosophie qui a guidé la décision de George H. W. Bush de frapper durement l'Irak et de s'en retirer plutôt que de viser un changement de régime.
The George H. W. Bush philosophy was born of something called the Powell Doctrine. Powell was the chief of the Joint Chiefs and was a national security advisor and a very bright general. Powell believed, based on the Vietnam experience, that if the United States goes to war, it has to have a clear military objective: Down the road, that's what I want to accomplish. I want to put the number of troops in that can take care of that problem, I want to have popular support, and I want to have an exit strategy. I want to go in, I want to accomplish it, and I want to get out.
That is what he said is the military's role. It's not there to build schools. It's a very important point.
George H. W. bought into that completely. That was, in a sense, the beauty of the Kuwait operation. We went in with vastly more troops than we needed, because Powell wanted to overwhelm the enemy. And he did. It was a 100-hour war. George H. W. then had before him the option of going up to Baghdad and taking care of the bad guy. People like Scowcroft said to him, "Mr. President, if you go up there, I can tell you right now, from the military point of view, we can do that. That's not hard. But once we get there, what do we do? Do we become the government? Who are the good guys we deal with? We couldn't tell you." And Bush wisely said, "We're not going."
Right now that Powell Doctrine, which you were alluding to, is something that exists in the far-out corners of the Washington strategic mind.
Abonnez-vous à la lettre d'information sur l'éthique de Carnegie pour en savoir plus sur l'éthique et les affaires internationales.
Ressources connexes
23 AOÛT 2021 - Article
L'éthique de la sortie d'Afghanistan
27 AVRIL 2005 - Transcription
Perdre l'Irak : Le fiasco de la reconstruction d'après-guerre
Initialement favorable à l'entrée en guerre, Phillips, ancien fonctionnaire du département d'État, évoque les erreurs commises en raison de l'absence de plan pour gagner la paix.
5 MARS 2003 - Transcription
La guerre en Irak : Pourquoi Saddam doit partir ... et pourquoi l'Amérique doit prendre les devants
William Kristol et Lawrence Kaplan affirment qu'un effort réussi de construction d'une nation en Irak ne sera pas seulement un catalyseur de changement au Moyen-Orient, mais servira également de preuve de la compatibilité entre les intérêts et les idéaux américains.