Global Ethics Corner: Award Achievement or Encourage Potential: The Nobel's Purpose?

Oct 16, 2009

When choosing Nobel Peace Prize winners, should the Nobel Committee think of the future, using the Nobel's prestige to encourage peace-making? Or should they identify achievements over time, rewarding those shown worthy?

Alfred Nobel's will focused on rewarding achievement, and his intention clearly was to promote peace.

The five-member Committee struggles with fulfilling this dual mandate. Do they think of the future, using the Nobel's prestige to encourage peace-making, or do they identify achievements over time, rewarding those shown worthy?

The Committee has chosen encouragement, as in the Middle East, or, more frequently, lifetimes of work, as in Bangladesh. Often both goals are met, especially when organizations are recognized.

Rarely is raw potential chosen, but the Committee Chairman said they wanted "to not only endorse but contribute to enhancing that kind of international policy and attitude which [Obama] stands for."

In contrast, Binyon suggests, "…the prize risks looking preposterous in its claims, patronizing in its intentions, and demeaning in its attempt to build up [Obama]..."

Globally, the Prize lends President Obama leverage. Domestically, it distracts from health care and the economic priorities. Generally, the Prize creates great potential for unmet expectations of vision and policy. Ironically, it comes as Obama runs wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Unearned prize? Significant encouragement? Both? What do you think?

By William Vocke

For further reading on the topic, see "Nobel Committee's Decision Courts Controversy" (Wall Street Journal, October 11, 2009), "Comment: absurd decision on Obama makes a mockery of the Nobel peace prize" (Times Online, October 9, 2009), and "Analysis: He won, but for what?" (Associated Press, October 9, 2009).

You may also like

NOV 13, 2024 Article

An Ethical Grey Zone: AI Agents in Political Deliberations

As adoption of agentic AI increases, it is critical for researchers and policymakers to agree on ethical principles to inform governance of this emerging technology.

CREDIT: Abobe/hamara.

SEP 25, 2024 Article

Politico Op-Ed: Walking a Fraying Nuclear Tightrope

In a new op-ed, Carnegie Council President Joel Rosenthal argues that a recommitment to nuclear arms control is nothing short of a moral imperative.

Left to Right: Eddie Mandhry, Abiodun Williams, Joel Rosenthal. CREDIT: Juhi Desai.

JUL 23, 2024 Video

Global Leadership in a Turbulent Time: A Conversation with Professor Abiodun Williams

In this roundtable discussion, Tufts University's Professor Abiodun Williams speaks about the essential leadership traits needed to drive institutional change.

Non traduit

Ce contenu n'a pas encore été traduit dans votre langue. Vous pouvez demander une traduction en cliquant sur le bouton ci-dessous.

Demande de traduction