Promoting Democracy through International Law

Mar 31, 2004

To view and/or download this report in its entirety, click on the attached PDF.

Abstract

The contributors argue that the Bush administration’s approach to democratization does not draw adequately on international law. The trial of Saddam Hussein and treatment of prisoners of war violate normal due process and, equally importantly, are symptomatic of an attitude that places elections first and basic human rights second. As a result, the model of democracy that is being promoted in and beyond the Arab world is neither sufficiently effective nor legitimate in the eyes of local populations and the international community.

The contributors propose a range of actions to enable the U.S. to regain its position as a standard-bearer on civil and political rights. They also discuss the relative merits of trials and truth commissions, the doctrine of pre-emption, and the role of the media.

Table of Contents
Foreword from the President
Joel Rosenthal

PROMOTING DEMOCRACY THROUGH INTERNATIONAL LAW
Democracy and Rule of Law Endangered
Remarks by Andrew Kuper

How International Law Strengthens New Democracies
Remarks by Richard Goldstone

No Democracy without International Law
Remarks by Aryeh Neier

Questions and Answers
1. Trials versus truth commissions
2. Responsible media and the complexity of international law
3. The Bush Doctrine of pre-emption: Is it legal?
4. Would a democracy compliance mechanism work?

You may also like

OCT 16, 2024 Video

Empowering Next-Gen Civic Leaders

The keynote event for Global Ethics Day 2024 featured a panel discussion on how we might enhance youth participation and intergenerational collaboration in civic life.

OCT 7, 2024 Video

Science Summit at UNGA79: Brain Economy Paradigm Shift for Democratic Renewal

As part of the 2024 UN Science Summit at the 79th UNGA, Joel Rosenthal discussed how democratic systems can prosper in the age of technological acceleration.

CREDIT: Abobe/hamara.

SEP 25, 2024 Article

Politico Op-Ed: Walking a Fraying Nuclear Tightrope

In a new op-ed, Carnegie Council President Joel Rosenthal argues that a recommitment to nuclear arms control is nothing short of a moral imperative.

Non traduit

Ce contenu n'a pas encore été traduit dans votre langue. Vous pouvez demander une traduction en cliquant sur le bouton ci-dessous.

Demande de traduction