African States, Aggressive Multilateralism And The WTO Dispute Settlement System

Aug 2, 2005

Paper presented at the Carnegie Council Fellows' Conference 2005. To access the full paper click on the "download" button at the bottom of the page.

SYNOPSIS

What accounts for the underutilization of the WTO dispute settlement process by states in Africa? What structural factors currently inhibit the ability of states in Africa to use the DSM to their advantage? What factors account for variation in the use of the DSM by developing countries more generally? What can African states learn from the experience of the developing countries that have used the system?

The goal of this research project was to assess the relevance of the DSM to states in Africa, investigate the reasons for the lack of utilization of the DSM by African states, suggest ways to improve the operation of the DSU in the interest of African states, and assess strategies outside the context of the WTO that African states could use to overcome some of the challenges they face in utilizing the DSM. To address the core factors that discourage African countries from participating in the DSM, meaningful reform of the DSU is called for and changes in the operation of the DSM required. There is also need to review the underlying trade rules, particularly the Agreement on Agriculture, for their effect on poor countries. However, African countries will also need to explore strategies outside of the context of the WTO to improve their prospects of participating in the DSU and in the multilateral trading system generally.

You may also like

Robert D. Kaplan & Stephen D. Hibbard. CREDIT: Simon Myaskovsky.

NOV 10, 2026 • Video

Getting China Right: The Ultimate Moral Dilemma

How can the U.S. avoid miscalculating when it comes to China? Access the Third Charles W. Kegley, Jr. Annual Lecture with Robert D. Kaplan.

NOV 6, 2026 • Podcast

Moral Courage, Individual Agency, and Institutional Trust

Former FBI special agent Asha Rangappa joins “Values & Interests” to discuss the ethical challenges facing public servants in an era of eroding institutional norms.

Clockwise: Nadav Avihay, Daniel A. Zarrilli, Janice Beecher, Rebecca Distler, Sylvana Q. Sinha, Jay Chaudhuri, Eleonore Fournier-Tombs, Molly Schaeffer, Jodi Vittori, Peter S. Goodman, Will Freeman, Joshua Acosta. CREDIT: Veronika Cernadas.

NOV 3, 2026 • Video

Carnegie Ethics Fellows Symposium 2026

Access expert panels on water ethics, AI in healthcare, economic and national security, and AI in humanitarian response, moderated by the Carnegie Ethics Fellows.

Non traduit

This content has not yet been translated into your language. You can request a translation by clicking the button below.

Demande de traduction